The rise of the ‘algo-state’ (algorithm-state) is troubling, as it relies on vague automated decision-making systems. Errors made by these systems can have significant repercussions on individuals, who even now struggle to address these complex technological issues. Moreover, the public’s ability to seek remedies has been weakened, leading to negative outcomes. The Data (Use and Access) Bill also greatly expands governmental powers to share personal data for law enforcement and security, allowing new data processing laws to be enacted with minimal Parliamentary review. This could result in the exchange of information like smart meter readings and educational data among different departments with little oversight.
Furthermore, the Bill removes the obligation for police to justify accessing personal records, potentially compromising accountability and public confidence. While the government may claim these changes promote innovation, they primarily advantage large technology firms in the U.S. and China, risking the UK’s data adequacy agreement with the EU, vital for international data transfers. This legislation appears to centralize power within the government and major technology companies, while eroding individual rights. As concerns about data, AI, and control grow, public scrutiny of these legislative shifts is likely to increase.
The ainewsarticles.com article you just read is a brief synopsis; the original article can be found here: Read the Full Article…
