A controversy has emerged at the ICLR conference over the submission of AI-generated studies by labs that either informed or neglected to inform peer reviewers, leading to criticism from academics regarding the ethical implications of using the peer review process for AI benchmarking. One lab, Sakana, withdrew its paper for transparency, while others faced backlash for not respecting reviewers’ time and contributions.
This is an ainewsarticles.com news flash; the original news article can be found here: Read the Full Article…
